Optimize agents | Opik Documentation | Opik Documentation
The Opik Agent Optimizer
The Opik Agent Optimizer can optimize both simple prompts and complex agent workflows. For most use cases, you can optimize prompts directly using ChatPrompt. When you need multi-prompt workflows, agent orchestration, or custom execution logic, you’ll use OptimizableAgent to create a custom agent class.
When to use OptimizableAgent vs ChatPrompt
Use ChatPrompt directly (default approach):
- Single-prompt optimization - optimizing one prompt template
- Most common use case
- No custom execution logic needed
Use OptimizableAgent when you need:
- Multi-prompt workflows - orchestrating multiple prompts in sequence
- Agent framework integration - connecting to ADK, LangGraph, CrewAI, etc.
- Custom execution logic - special tool handling, async workflows, etc.
Optimizers work seamlessly with both approaches. The optimizer calls your agent’s invoke_agent() method repeatedly during optimization, passing different prompt candidates to evaluate.
Single-prompt optimization
For most optimization tasks, you can use ChatPrompt directly without creating a custom agent. The optimizer uses a default LiteLLM-based agent under the hood.
from opik_optimizer import ChatPrompt, MetaPromptOptimizer
from opik.evaluation.metrics import LevenshteinRatio
from opik_optimizer.datasets import hotpot
dataset = hotpot(count=300)
def levenshtein_ratio(dataset_item, llm_output):
return LevenshteinRatio().score(
reference=dataset_item["answer"],
output=llm_output
)
prompt = ChatPrompt(
system="You are a helpful assistant.",
user="{question}",
model="openai/gpt-4o-mini"
)
optimizer = MetaPromptOptimizer(model="openai/gpt-4o")
result = optimizer.optimize_prompt(
prompt=prompt,
dataset=dataset,
metric=levenshtein_ratio,
max_trials=5,
n_samples=50
)
result.display()
Custom agent for framework integration
When integrating with specific agent frameworks (Google ADK, LangGraph, CrewAI, etc.), you’ll create a custom OptimizableAgent subclass. This allows the optimizer to work with your framework’s execution model.
Here’s an example for Google ADK:
from typing import Any, TYPE_CHECKING
from opik_optimizer import OptimizableAgent
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from opik_optimizer.api_objects import chat_prompt
class ADKAgent(OptimizableAgent):
project_name = "adk-agent"
def invoke_agent(
self,
prompts: dict[str, chat_prompt.ChatPrompt],
dataset_item: dict[str, Any],
allow_tool_use: bool = False,
seed: int | None = None,
) -> str:
# Single-prompt agents extract the prompt from the dict
if len(prompts) > 1:
raise ValueError("ADKAgent only supports single-prompt optimization.")
prompt = list(prompts.values())[0]
messages = prompt.get_messages(dataset_item)
# Your framework-specific execution logic here
# ... create ADK agent, run it, return response ...
return response
Multi-prompt optimization
For multi-step agent workflows, you must use OptimizableAgent because ChatPrompt only handles a single prompt. Multi-prompt optimization allows you to optimize multiple prompts that work together in a pipeline.
When to use multi-prompt optimization
- Sequential reasoning workflows (analyze → respond)
- Multi-hop retrieval pipelines
- Agent orchestration with multiple steps
- Any workflow where one prompt’s output feeds into another
Implementing a multi-prompt agent
Here’s a simple example of a two-step workflow that analyzes input and then generates a response:
from typing import Any
from opik_optimizer import ChatPrompt, OptimizableAgent
from openai import OpenAI
class AnalyzeRespondAgent(OptimizableAgent):
"""Two-step agent: analyze input, then respond based on analysis."""
def __init__(self, model: str = "gpt-4o-mini"):
super().__init__()
self.model = model
self.client = OpenAI()
def invoke_agent(
self,
prompts: dict[str, ChatPrompt],
dataset_item: dict[str, Any],
allow_tool_use: bool = False,
seed: int | None = None,
) -> str:
# Step 1: Analyze the input
analyze_prompt = prompts["analyze"]
analyze_messages = analyze_prompt.get_messages(dataset_item)
analyze_response = self.client.chat.completions.create(
model=self.model,
messages=analyze_messages,
seed=seed,
)
analysis = analyze_response.choices[0].message.content
# Step 2: Generate response based on analysis
respond_prompt = prompts["respond"]
# Pass analysis result to the respond prompt
respond_context = {**dataset_item, "analysis": analysis}
respond_messages = respond_prompt.get_messages(respond_context)
respond_response = self.client.chat.completions.create(
model=self.model,
messages=respond_messages,
seed=seed,
)
return respond_response.choices[0].message.content
Using the multi-prompt agent
When optimizing, pass a dictionary of prompts instead of a single prompt:
from opik_optimizer import ChatPrompt, MetaPromptOptimizer
from opik.evaluation.metrics import LevenshteinRatio
# Define both prompts in the workflow
prompts = {
"analyze": ChatPrompt(
system="You are an analysis assistant. Extract key information from the input.",
user="{text}",
model="gpt-4o-mini"
),
"respond": ChatPrompt(
system="You are a response assistant. Generate a helpful response based on the analysis.",
user="Analysis: {analysis}\n\nOriginal question: {text}",
model="gpt-4o-mini"
),
}
optimizer = MetaPromptOptimizer(model="openai/gpt-4o")
result = optimizer.optimize_prompt(
prompt=prompts, # Pass dict of prompts
agent_class=AnalyzeRespondAgent, # Use your custom agent
dataset=dataset,
metric=levenshtein_ratio,
max_trials=5,
n_samples=50
)
result.display()
Key implementation details
invoke_agent() method signature
All OptimizableAgent subclasses must implement invoke_agent():
def invoke_agent(
self,
prompts: dict[str, ChatPrompt],
dataset_item: dict[str, Any],
allow_tool_use: bool = False,
seed: int | None = None,
) -> str:
# Your implementation here
return response_string
Parameters:
prompts: Dictionary mapping prompt names toChatPromptobjectsdataset_item: Dataset row used to format prompt messagesallow_tool_use: Whether tools may be executed (for tool-calling prompts)seed: Optional random seed for reproducibility
Returns: A single string output that will be scored by your metric function
Extracting messages from prompts
Use ChatPrompt.get_messages() to format the prompt with dataset values:
messages = prompt.get_messages(dataset_item)
# Returns list of message dicts: [{"role": "system", "content": "..."}, ...]
For multi-prompt workflows, pass additional context when calling get_messages():
# Pass intermediate results to subsequent prompts
context = {**dataset_item, "intermediate_result": some_value}
messages = prompt.get_messages(context)
Best practices
- Error handling: Return meaningful error messages if execution fails
- Model parameters: Respect
prompt.modelandprompt.model_kwargsfor consistency - Reproducibility: Use the
seedparameter when making LLM calls - Opik tracing: The base class handles tracing automatically, but you can add custom metadata via
self.trace_metadata
Complete examples
Single-prompt with ChatPrompt (default)
from opik_optimizer import ChatPrompt, EvolutionaryOptimizer
from opik_optimizer.datasets import hotpot
from opik.evaluation.metrics import LevenshteinRatio
dataset = hotpot(count=300)
def metric(dataset_item, llm_output):
return LevenshteinRatio().score(
reference=dataset_item["answer"],
output=llm_output
)
prompt = ChatPrompt(
system="You are a helpful assistant.",
user="{question}",
model="openai/gpt-4o-mini"
)
optimizer = EvolutionaryOptimizer(
model="openai/gpt-4o-mini",
population_size=5,
num_generations=3
)
result = optimizer.optimize_prompt(
prompt=prompt,
dataset=dataset,
metric=metric,
n_samples=50
)
result.display()
Multi-prompt workflow
from typing import Any
from opik_optimizer import ChatPrompt, OptimizableAgent, HRPO
from opik.evaluation.metrics import LevenshteinRatio
from opik_optimizer.datasets import hotpot
from openai import OpenAI
class TwoStepAgent(OptimizableAgent):
def __init__(self, model: str = "gpt-4o-mini"):
super().__init__()
self.model = model
self.client = OpenAI()
def invoke_agent(
self,
prompts: dict[str, ChatPrompt],
dataset_item: dict[str, Any],
allow_tool_use: bool = False,
seed: int | None = None,
) -> str:
# First step
step1_prompt = prompts["step1"]
step1_messages = step1_prompt.get_messages(dataset_item)
step1_response = self.client.chat.completions.create(
model=self.model,
messages=step1_messages,
seed=seed,
)
step1_result = step1_response.choices[0].message.content
# Second step uses result from first step
step2_prompt = prompts["step2"]
step2_context = {**dataset_item, "step1_result": step1_result}
step2_messages = step2_prompt.get_messages(step2_context)
step2_response = self.client.chat.completions.create(
model=self.model,
messages=step2_messages,
seed=seed,
)
return step2_response.choices[0].message.content
# Define multi-prompt workflow
prompts = {
"step1": ChatPrompt(
system="Analyze the question and identify key information.",
user="{question}",
model="gpt-4o-mini"
),
"step2": ChatPrompt(
system="Answer the question based on the analysis.",
user="Question: {question}\n\nAnalysis: {step1_result}",
model="gpt-4o-mini"
),
}
dataset = hotpot(count=300)
def metric(dataset_item, llm_output):
return LevenshteinRatio().score(
reference=dataset_item["answer"],
output=llm_output
)
optimizer = HRPO(
model="openai/gpt-4o-mini",
n_threads=2,
max_parallel_batches=3
)
result = optimizer.optimize_prompt(
prompt=prompts,
agent_class=TwoStepAgent,
dataset=dataset,
metric=metric,
max_trials=5,
n_samples=50
)
result.display()
For advanced multi-prompt examples, see sdks/opik_optimizer/benchmarks/agents/hotpot_multihop_agent.py which implements a complex multi-hop retrieval pipeline with Wikipedia search.
Next steps
- Explore optimization algorithms to choose the right optimizer
- Learn about defining datasets and metrics
- Check framework-specific examples in
sdks/opik_optimizer/scripts/llm_frameworks/